WORK AND PENSIONS

Hospital Stays (Benefit Claims)

Annabelle Ewing: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions 
	(1)  how many people in Scotland have been claiming benefits whilst staying in long stay hospitals in (a) each of the past five years and (b) the current financial year; and what the forecast is for the next three years;
	(2)  what the total expenditure was on benefits for people in Scotland who stay in long stay hospitals in (a) each year of the past five years and (b) the current financial year; and what the forecast is for the next three years.

Maria Eagle: holding answer 11 March 2002
	The information is not available in the format requested.

Disability Living Allowance

Paul Goggins: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what proposals he has to clarify the conditions of entitlement for the lower rate mobility component of disability living allowance.

Maria Eagle: Regulations have today been laid before Parliament together with copies of the Social Security Advisory Committee's report on them and the Secretary of State's response to that report.
	The regulations make clear that for a severely disabled person to qualify for the lower rate mobility component of Disability Living Allowance on the grounds that fear or anxiety prevents them from walking out of doors on unfamiliar routes without guidance or supervision from another person most of the time, the fear or anxiety must be a symptom of a mental disability. This clarification is needed to remove uncertainty and the possibility of misinterpretation of the qualifying conditions in these circumstances. The regulations do not otherwise alter the conditions for entitlement to the lower rate mobility component, and severely disabled people whose physical or mental disabilities alone mean that they cannot walk out of doors on unfamiliar routes without guidance or supervision from another person most of the time will continue to qualify.

Minimum Income Guarantee

Norman Lamb: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how much additional money, in total per year, would be paid to pensioners in North Norfolk if those not presently claiming the minimum income guarantee were to claim it.

Malcolm Wicks: The information requested is unavailable.

Minimum Income Guarantee

Norman Lamb: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many entitled non-recipients of the minimum income guarantee there are in (a) the North Norfolk constituency and (b) England.

Maria Eagle: Estimates of the number of pensioners who may be entitled to but have not claimed the Minimum Income Guarantee are not available below national level. National estimates are contained in the publication "Take Up of Income Related Benefits: Statistics for 1999–2000". A copy is held in the Library.

PRIME MINISTER

Civil Servants

Paul Burstow: To ask the Prime Minister if he will set out for each Civil Service grade within his (a) Department and (b) Department's executive agencies the (i) total number of staff employed, (ii) number aged (A) 16 to 25, (B) 26 to 35, (C) 36 to 45, (D) 46 to 60 and (E) over the age of 60 years, (iii) number of registered disabled and (iv) number of ethnic minorities.

Tony Blair: I refer the hon. Member to the answer given to him by my hon. Friend the Parliamentary Secretary, Cabinet Office on 13 March 2002, Official Report, column 1072W.

Relocation Expenses

John Bercow: To ask the Prime Minister what his policy is on the payment of relocation expenses to staff in his office.

Tony Blair: I refer the hon. Member to the answer given to him by my hon. Friend the Parliamentary Secretary, Cabinet Office on 14 March 2002, Official Report, columns 1207–08W.

Gender Pay Gap

John Bercow: To ask the Prime Minister what assessment he has made of the extent of the gender pay gap amongst staff in his Office.

Tony Blair: I refer the hon. Member to the answer given to him by my hon. Friend the Parliamentary Secretary, Cabinet Office on 12 March 2002, Official Report, column 956W.

Zimbabwe

Graham Brady: To ask the Prime Minister, pursuant to his oral statement of 6 March 2002, Official Report, column 303, on the Commonwealth Heads of Government meeting, what plans he has to consult on the Zimbabwe's attendance at the Commonwealth Games, following the outcome of the Zimbabwean election; and if he will report the outcome if his consultations to Parliament.

Tony Blair: I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave him on 11 March 2002, Official Report, column 682W.

DEFENCE

Private Simon Jeans

Bernard Jenkin: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence on how many occasions since 1997 he has made representations to his Croatian counterpart regarding the killing of Private Simon Jeans in Split, Croatia, in September 1996.

Adam Ingram: The case was raised at Ministerial level with the Croatian Defence Minister, during his visit to the UK in March 2000. This was in addition to regular dialogue between the British Embassy and Defence Staff in Zagreb and Split, and the Croatian authorities, throughout the course of the trial of those accused of killing Private Jeans.

Colerne Airfield

James Gray: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence 
	(1)  what long-term plans he has for Colerne Airfield;
	(2)  what plans he has for the re-basing of 21 Signals Regiment from Azinghur Barracks at Colerne;
	(3)  how many civilian staff are employed at Azinghur Barracks, Colerne;
	(4)  if he will make a statement about the future of Colerne Airfield and Azinghur Barracks.

Adam Ingram: An internal study into the future location of 21 Signal Regiment (AS), currently based at Azimghur Barracks, has been completed recently. The study concluded that in principle there were sound operational and financial reasons to support a move of the unit to Gamecock Barracks, Bramcote where it would be co-located with 30 Signal Regiment.
	Colerne Airfield is not part of this work and there are no plans for its closure. The two other units at Colerne—1001 Support Unit RAF and Bristol University Air Squadron—are also not part of this internal study, but as the hon. Member is aware, we are undertaking a separate review of University Air Squadron Flying.
	Further work is required before any decision to move 21 Signal Regiment could be finalised, and it would be premature therefore to make a statement about the future of Azimghur Barracks at this stage. The Ministry of Defence will, of course, be consulting with the Trade Unions and the 81 civilian staff who support 21 Signal Regiment in due course. I will write to the hon. Member once a final decision in made and a copy of my letter will be placed in the Library of the House.

Colerne Airfield

James Gray: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many flights by Bristol University OTC there have been in each of the last five years from Colerne Airfield.

Adam Ingram: The information is not held in the format requested. However, it is possible to provide the number of hours which Bristol University Air Squadron flew in each of the last four years from Colerne Airfield. The Tutor aircraft used by the University Air Squadron are also used by the No. 3 Air Cadet Air Experience Flight and the hours flown by them are also shown.
	
		
			 Financial Year University Air Squadron Air Experience Flight 
		
		
			 1998–99 1,580 2,825 
			 1999–2000 1,668 2,428 
			 2000–01 1,551 2,218 
			 2001–02* 1,362 1,832 
		
	
	* to date

Colerne Airfield

James Gray: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what assessment he has made of where Bristol University OTC will train if Colerne Airfield closes.

Adam Ingram: There are no plans for Colerne Airfield to close, so no assessment of alternative locations for Bristol University Air Squadron to train has been undertaken. A review of University Air Squadron flying is being undertaken, but this is not specific to the Bristol University Air Squadron and the outcome of the review will not be known until the end of April at the earliest.

Harrier Aircraft

Bernard Jenkin: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the cost is of the Harrier GR7 upgrade; and if he will make a statement.

Adam Ingram: I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave on 13 March 2002, Official Report, columns 1166–67W.

Harrier Aircraft

Bernard Jenkin: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many Harrier GR7 will be upgraded to GR9 standard; and what the estimated completion date is of the upgrade programme.

Adam Ingram: We currently plan to upgrade 68 Harrier GR7 aircraft to the GR9 standard with the work being completed during 2008.

HMS Talent

Bernard Jenkin: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the operational status of HMS Talent is; and if she will be operational for the rest of the year.

Adam Ingram: HMS Talent is currently at sea conducting operations and has been operational since September 2001. The submarine is scheduled to remain fully operational until the end of May this year before entering a Lay-up period prior to refit.

NATO Central Europe Division

Bernard Jenkin: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what representations he has (a) made to and (b) received from his (i) Belgian, (ii) German and (iii) Dutch counterparts regarding the future of NATO's Multinational Central Europe division MND (C).

Geoff Hoon: In 2001, NATO's Military Committee agreed that the role of selected formations, including the Multinational Division (Central), must be addressed in the NATO Force Structure Review. We are discussing the future of this formation with our counterparts in Germany, the Netherlands and Belgium.

NATO Central Europe Division

Bernard Jenkin: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the UK contribution is to NATO's Multinational Central Europe division MND (C).

Geoff Hoon: The United Kingdom has 27 peace establishment posts on the staff of the Headquarters Multinational Division (Central) in Germany. In addition, the United Kingdom assigns a number of forces to the Multinational Division (Central), which may be called on for specific operations. These include an Air Defence Regiment, Combat Service Support and elements of the Support Helicopter Force.

TRADE AND INDUSTRY

Correspondence

Graham Allen: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry when she will reply to letters from the hon. Member for Nottingham, North, relating to case work involving (a) Ms R. Ensor, (b) Mr. Byers, (c) Mrs. Carney, (d) Mr. M. Dawber and (e) Ms Sue Jayes; and if she will make a statement on her Department's policy on responding to letters from hon. Members.

Melanie Johnson: My hon. Friend has received a reply dated 26 February 2002.

Insolvency Service

Nigel Waterson: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what her role is in authorising Insolvency Practitioners; and what representations she has received about changing this procedure.

Melanie Johnson: Under the provisions of Section 392 of the Insolvency Act 1986, the Secretary of State may directly authorise individuals to act as insolvency practitioners and 133 are so authorised. Section 391 of the Insolvency Act 1986 provides that the Secretary of State may also recognise bodies as able to authorise their members to act as insolvency practitioners.
	The regulation of insolvency practice was the subject of a review during 1997 and 1998. The report of the review committee was published in February 1999.

Insolvency Service

Nigel Waterson: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what training is provided to the staff responsible for the operation of the Insolvency Service hotline; and what the total training cost for the team has been since the hotline's introduction.

Melanie Johnson: The hotline team currently comprises four Official Receiver trained staff with substantial experience of insolvency related matters. They do not require specific additional training.

Insolvency Service

Nigel Waterson: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what meetings she has had since 2001 with representatives of the Insolvency Service and if she will publish the minutes of the meetings.

Melanie Johnson: I regularly meet officials from The Insolvency Service. Under Exemption 2 of the Code of Practice on Access to Government Information minutes of those meetings are not published.

Insolvency Service

Nigel Waterson: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what steps her Department is taking to publicise to directors their insolvency liabilities; and how much this advertising has cost the Insolvency Service each year since 1997.

Melanie Johnson: The Insolvency Service produced a number of guidance leaflets regarding various insolvency related matters, which are available on its website, including a guide for directors which describes the various procedures in detail and informs directors what duties and responsibilities they have if their company is subject to insolvency procedures. The Insolvency Service has also ensured that the information provided by Companies House to the officers of newly formed companies contains details of their responsibilities whilst managing limited companies.
	In addition, when my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry successfully applies to have an unfit director disqualified from acting as a director, or accepts an undertaking not to act in that capacity, press releases are issued in local newspapers and trade journals relevant to the insolvent company. Details of the director's misconduct complained of in the application to disqualify are provided. Public reporting thus also assists greatly in the drive to increase the business community's awareness of the dangers of running a company whilst insolvent.
	Publicity costs have been £155,000 in 1999–00; £112,000 in 2000–01 and £66,000 in 2001–02 (11 months). Costs for the period prior to 1999 cannot be obtained without incurring disproportionate costs.

Insolvency Service

Nigel Waterson: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what initiatives are in place to (a) monitor and (b) improve customer service standards in the Insolvency Service.

Melanie Johnson: To monitor customer service standards The Insolvency Service has an audit process through which performance against its published service standards (set in accordance with Charter standards) is measured and monitored both locally and centrally within the Agency.
	To further enhance customer service standards The Insolvency Service has: a National Consultative User Group and a Central Accounting Unit User Group; user comment cards and a website pop-up questionnaire; a complaints process; a staff New Ideas Scheme and an e-business strategy.

Insolvency Service

Nigel Waterson: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what plans she has to make proposals regarding the bankruptcy period for personal insolvency cases.

Melanie Johnson: The White Paper "Opportunity for All in a World of Change: Insolvency—A Second Chance" published the Government's proposals for reforms to the law of personal insolvency in July 2001.

Insolvency Service

Nigel Waterson: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what plans her Department has to remove the bankruptcy fee payable to the Insolvency Service.

Melanie Johnson: There are no plans to remove the fee payable in relation to the Official Receiver's administration of a debtor's estate in bankruptcy.

Insolvency Service

Nigel Waterson: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what representations she has received about the priority given to creditors of companies in administration under the Insolvency Act 2000.

Melanie Johnson: I have received no representations.

Insolvency Service

Nigel Waterson: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how many insolvency petitions for (a) small and (b) medium enterprises were allocated to each Official Receiver's office in England and Wales in each year since 1997.

Melanie Johnson: Statistics are not maintained distinguishing between small and medium sized enterprises.

Oil and Gas Exploration Licences

David Stewart: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if she will make a statement on her Department's policy on the development of Fallow Field oil and gas exploration licences.

Brian Wilson: The UK cannot afford to have petroleum discoveries or areas of the Continental Shelf lying fallow. We believe that petroleum licences should be in the hands of those companies that are committed to undertaking appropriate work to find, test and develop effectively the UK's petroleum resources in the shortest possible time span.
	The DTI has worked with the oil and gas industry in PILOT to establish a robust mechanism that will encourage companies holding fallow blocks or discoveries to decide within a reasonable time scale (15 months for fallow blocks and just over two years for fallow discoveries), whether to be active and move towards development or relinquish the licences on which they sit so that others have an opportunity to act.
	Officials in my Department have identified some 120 fallow discoveries and 160 fallow blocks on the UKCS where the current owners do not appear to be doing all that they can to generate activity. These fallow assets could encompass 250 undrilled structures and contain reserves equivalent to around 1.5 billion barrels of oil.
	The mechanism was launched on 5 March and we immediately wrote to each licensee that has been identified as holding fallow blocks and discoveries to initiate the first stage of the process.
	The performance of companies holding fallow assets will be reviewed every year to ensure that they remain focused on bringing forward activity.

Motor Vehicle Insurance

Simon Thomas: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if she will direct the Office of Fair Trading to inquire into the use by insurance companies' approved repairer schemes of language which prevents customers choosing to use alternative local garages.

Melanie Johnson: The Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 enable the Office of Fair Trading to act against businesses using standard terms in consumer contracts that cause consumer detriment including ambiguous or unintelligible terms. Any evidence to suggest such unfair contract terms should be passed directly to the Director General of Fair Trading.

Exchange Direct plc

Bill Wiggin: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what steps her Department is taking to investigate Exchange Direct plc.

Melanie Johnson: A winding up order was made against Exchange Direct plc on 23 January 2002 and the Official Receiver is now responsible for investigating the reasons for the company's failure and the conduct of its directors. The affairs of the company are also the subject of an investigation by police, and the Official Receiver will provide assistance as required.

Personal Debt

Terry Rooney: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry when she will announce the result of the consultation on fee charging debt advice.

Melanie Johnson: holding answer 12 March 2002
	The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) consulted on draft guidelines for debt management companies last year. The OFT announced the outcome of its consultation and published the final guidance on 4 December 2001. Breaches of the guidance by companies could lead to the loss of their consumer credit licence.
	Copies of the Guidelines are available from the OFT or from their website at: www.oft.gov.uk.

Personal Debt

Terry Rooney: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry when she will announce the outcome of the consultation on excessive interest charged on personal debt.

Melanie Johnson: holding answer 12 March 2002
	I published the results of our consultation on "Tackling loan sharks—and more!" on 15 February 2002. The consultation showed overwhelming support for proposals to clamp down on loan sharks and the other priorities identified.
	Copies of both the Consultation Paper and the Summary of Responses are available from the Libraries of the House or from the DTI website at: www2.dti.gov.uk/CACP/ca/policy/consumercredit/review.htm.
	Further details on specific proposals will be published over the course of next year.

Mirror Group Newspapers

Linda Gilroy: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what actions she has taken following the publication of the Companies Act Inspectors' report into Mirror Group Newspapers plc on 30 March 2001.

Patricia Hewitt: Independent inspectors were appointed under Companies Act powers to investigate and report on the affairs and membership of Mirror Group Newspapers plc. They were asked to look, in particular, at the flotation of Mirror Group Newspapers on 30 April 1991.
	Following receipt of the report, the DTI's Companies Investigation Branch sought legal advice on whether disqualification proceedings should be instigated under the Company Directors Disqualification Act against any of those involved.
	After careful consideration of advice from leading Counsel, officials have recommended, and I have agreed, not to institute disqualification proceedings.
	Important lessons have been learnt from the Mirror Group Newspapers affair and, as the inspectors themselves noted, a number of important changes were made prior to their final report. The report made a number of further recommendations which have all been passed for consideration to the different Departmental bodies and regulators that hold responsibility in these areas.
	As the inspectors suggested, the Company Law Review considered a number of issues and the Government will be announcing their response to these and the rest of the Review's recommendations in due course. I have recently announced the setting up of a group jointly with the Treasury and including other regulators to oversee and co-ordinate the response in the UK to auditing and accounting issues raised by the collapse of Enron. This work is also relevant to the concerns expressed by the inspectors on the independence of auditors. I have also announced an independent review of the role and effectiveness of non-executive directors in the UK. The review will report jointly to me and the Chancellor of the Exchequer.
	Where particular recommendations are the prime responsibility of other Departments and regulatory authorities I am liaising with these other bodies and will further inform the House in due course.

Arms Exports (Angola)

Elfyn Llwyd: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what the Department's policy is on granting export licences for arms to Angola; and if she will make a statement.

Denis MacShane: I have been asked to reply.
	We consider export licence applications to Angola against the following:
	(a) Whether the export is permitted under UN Sanctions. UN Security Council Resolution 864 (1993) imposed an arms embargo in relation to UNITA. The supply of arms and related material to Angola is prohibited except through named entry points provided by the Angolan Government. The UK interprets the scope of all such arms embargoes to cover goods and technology on Military List.
	(b) UK national policy. It is UK policy not to grant export licences for new military or dual-use equipment for those countries intervening in the conflict in the Democratic Republic of Congo (Angola, Burundi, Namibia, Rwanda, Uganda and Zimbabwe) where there is a clear risk that it would be used in the Democratic Republic of Congo (Ministerial statement HC 184 and 185, Date in force 9 February 2000).
	(c) If the application passes these stages, we then judge it against the consolidated EU and national arms export licensing criteria. This includes assessing the proposed export against internal repression, internal conflict, external aggression concerns and risk of diversion (criteria 2, 3, 4 and 7).

HOME DEPARTMENT

Justice and Home Affairs Council

Michael Connarty: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the outcome was of the Justice and Home Affairs Council held in Brussels on 28 February; what the Government's stance was on the issues discussed, including its voting record; and if he will make a statement.

Angela Eagle: I represented the United Kingdom (UK) at the Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) Council in Brussels on 28 February 2002.
	International Co-operation of the European Union against organised crime (an open debate):
	The Council held an open debate on the international co-operation of the European Union against organised crime. The debate focused on the need for enhanced external action, using the range of tools available including funding programmes and agreements based on Article 38 of the Treaty on European Union.
	A points:
	The A points were approved as in document PTS A 8 (6495/02) (a copy of which has been placed in the Library of the House). These included adoption of the Council Decision setting up Eurojust and adoption of implementing rules under the Eurodac Regulation (2725/2000/EC).
	Draft Framework Decision on the execution in the European Union of orders freezing property or evidence:
	A general approach was approved on a Presidency compromise text, subject to six Parliamentary scrutiny reserves (Denmark, Sweden, Netherlands, Ireland, Italy and the UK), consideration of the opinion which the European Parliament delivered in September 2001 and re-consultation of the European Parliament on the revised text. Two amendments were agreed at the Council itself: (a) to include the language on fundamental rights which is used in Article 1(3) of the European Arrest Warrant text; and (b) the drafting of a further ground for refusal in Article 6 relating to the ne bis in idem principle. I will provide the European Scrutiny Committee with the consolidated English text resulting from the Council when it is issued. I will also write to the Chairman of the Committee about the term "general approach".
	Relations with the United States of America (USA):
	The Council endorsed a two-stage approach to drawing up an agreement with the USA on judicial co-operation in criminal matters, in accordance with the conclusions of the special JHA Council on 20 September 2001. The first stage will consist of continuing informal exploratory talks with the United States, and, in parallel, work within the Council on the scope and principles of an agreement or agreement. After this, a formal negotiating mandate would be adopted, if possible at the JHA Council on 25 April 2002. There was general agreement in the Council that particular attention would need to be given to human rights safeguards in relation to issues such as the death penalty and special courts and to data protection. There was also general agreement on the need for clarity about the areas in which an European Union (EU)/United States (US) agreement could add value to existing bilateral arrangements.
	Green Paper on criminal law protection of the financial interests of the Community and the establishment of a European Prosecutor: presentation by the Commission:
	Commissioner Schreyer presented the Commission's Green Paper to the Council. In a brief debate which followed, all but one of the speakers questioned the need for a European Public Prosecutor. A number of delegations pointed out that the decision to establish Eurojust had just been adopted and Eurojust should be given the chance to perform the role it had been given in relation to fraud against the Community budget.
	Proposal for a comprehensive plan to combat illegal immigration and trafficking in human beings in the European Union:
	The Council approved the comprehensive action plan, which is based on the Commission's Communication on illegal immigration.
	Report on the introduction of the euro-Police co-operation (information point):
	The Council took note of a presentation by the Director of Europol on law enforcement work to protect the euro before and during the changeover period. The Director reported that recorded incidents of counterfeiting were low in number and sophistication.
	European Police College (CEPOL)—Provisional management solution:
	The Council endorsed a provisional management solution, whereby Denmark will temporarily host the secretariat of CEPOL pending a decision on the location of the permanent secretariat. This will facilitate implementation of this year's annual work programme.
	Amendments of the Europol Convention:
	There was broad agreement on the principle of amending the Europol Convention to allow Europol staff to participate in joint investigative teams in a support capacity and to authorise Europol to ask Member States to initiate investigations, in accordance with the conclusions of the Tampere European Council. The Article 36 Committee was asked to work on finalising the necessary amendments. Debate focused on the possibility of introducing a simplified procedure for amending the Europol Convention. All delegations agreed on the need for a simplified procedure for amending the Europol Convention, but there was no consensus on the actual mechanism. The Presidency presented three options:
	(i) a protocol providing for future amendments to the Convention to be made by a simple decision of the Council;
	(ii) a variation of (i) limited to certain less sensitive articles; and
	(iii) replacement of the Europol Convention with a Council Decision.
	The first option raised constitutional difficulties for a number of Member States, and options (ii) and (iii) attracted most support. I indicated that the UK could accept any of the three options in principle, but we considered that option (iii) was the simplest and that option (ii) might prove difficult in practice. This was referred to the working group for further consideration.
	Setting up an Air Marshal system in the European Union:
	The Austrian Minister presented a paper describing national experience of air marshals and proposing that the EU should consider such a system. This received a cautious response. Together with a number of other Ministers, I noted that the Transport Council was considering this and other aviation security issues. It was agreed that the issue should be referred back to Coreper to consider whether it should be taken any further in the JHA area.
	Any Other Business:
	Austria reported that in accordance with Article 2(2) of the Schengen Convention, it intended to re-impose border controls during a visit by the Iranian President on 11–13 March 2002.
	Meeting with the candidate countries in the margins of the Council:
	Justice and Interior Ministers met with their counterparts from the candidate countries in the margins of the Council. A Joint Declaration on drugs was approved. The Candidate Countries also provided updates on their progress in improving border controls at their external borders.

Departmental Website

John Bercow: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the total cost of his Department's website was in real terms in each of the last four years; and how many hits it received in each of those years.

Angela Eagle: The available information for the main Home Office website is shown in the table. Because members of the website team have not been employed exclusively on this work throughout the period, their costs have been excluded from this table.
	Information is not held centrally on websites that are managed independently of the main site.
	
		
			 Year Cost Number of page impressions 
		
		
			 1998–99 Not separately identified Not available 
			 1999–2000 £40,614 9,066,894 
			 2000–01 £58,170 16,495,939 
			 2001–02 £133,339 7,969,832 (to 30/9/01) 
		
	
	The Home Office website moved to a new server on 1 October 2001; reliable data are not yet available on the number of page impressions since that date.
	The Immigration and Nationality Directorate (IND) established a separate site in late 2000. It measures unique visitors to the site, not the number of hits or page impressions. There were 836,711 unique visitors to the IND site during the year 2001, the first full year of operation.
	With almost half of the homes in the United Kingdom now online* and public access on the rise, our website is an invaluable tool for disseminating important information to the public and in opening up new areas of knowledge about Home Office activity in general. It is a cost-effective vehicle that allows us to speak to many people at once and offers the option for anyone to give us their feedback.
	* Oftel January 2002

Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act

Simon Hughes: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many people have been detained under the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 since the 19 December 2001; and if he will make a statement.

David Blunkett: Nine foreign nationals have so far been detained using powers in Part IV of the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act. Of those detained two have left the United Kingdom voluntarily; the other seven remain in detention.

Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act

Peter Lilley: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many foreign citizens have been detained under the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001.

David Blunkett: Nine foreign nationals have so far been detained using powers in Part IV of the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act. Of those detained two have left the United Kingdom voluntarily.

Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act

Jim Cunningham: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many people have been held under suspicion of being a terrorist under the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001.

David Blunkett: holding answer 11 March 2002
	Nine foreign nationals have so far been detained using powers in part IV of the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act. Of those detained two have left the United Kingdom voluntarily; the other seven remain in detention.

Protec

Oliver Letwin: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what Government security services are provided by Protec.

David Blunkett: holding answer 3 December 2001
	Please accept my apologies for the delay in replying.
	SDA Protec Ltd in the United Kingdom has carried out work across a number of Departments under arrangements approved by Government. It would not be appropriate for me to comment on individual commercial contracts.
	Departments are required to ensure that any security contractor is reputable and reliable. Where a contractor needs access to sensitive official information then specific security standards must be met, and an appropriate security clearance is required for any employees requiring access to this information. Such companies are periodically inspected by the security authorities to ensure that these obligations are being fulfilled. If the hon. Member has any specific concerns I would be prepared to discuss these in confidence.

Police Legislation

Keith Vaz: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many Acts of Parliament have affected the police service since 1990; and if he will list them.

John Denham: A list of all those statutes which make an explicit reference either to the police or to police authorities has, due to its length, been placed in the Library. Additional statutes relating to the criminal justice system have also been included. Other statutes may also affect the police service as they do a wide variety of other bodies and organisations, although their provisions do not deal specifically with policing or criminal justice issues. However, an investigation of all Acts of Parliament since 1990 to assess their possible effect on the police in this way is not possible without disproportionate cost.

British Crime Survey

Helen Clark: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will include road traffic injuries and fatalities in the British Crime Survey.

Bob Ainsworth: This would not be appropriate. The British Crime Survey asks respondents about their experiences of, and views about, crime. This is a different matter to road traffic injuries and fatalities, which may or may not be the result of a criminal act, such as dangerous driving.

Crime Statistics

Nigel Evans: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many incidents of drink related and disorderly crime there were reported in 1997 and each subsequent year in (a) Preston, (b) Blackburn, (c) Lancashire, (d) the North West of England, (e) Wales and (f) the UK.

John Denham: The information requested is not available.

Crime Statistics

Nigel Evans: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many incidents of violent crime were reported in 1997 and each subsequent year in (a) Preston, (b) Blackburn, (c) Lancashire, (d) the North West of England, (e) Wales and (f) the UK.

John Denham: Details are given in the table. Details for Crime and Disorder Reduction Partnership areas have been collected centrally since 1 April 1999.
	There was a change in counting rules for recorded crime on 1 April 1998, which expanded the offences covered, and placed a greater emphasis on counting crimes in terms of numbers of victims. Numbers of recorded crimes after this date are therefore not directly comparable with previous years. Over England and Wales as a whole, the change in counting rules caused an increase in total recorded violent crime of 83 per cent.
	It should be noted that recorded violent crime is subject to changes in reporting and recording. The 2001 British Crime Survey found that, over England and Wales as a whole, reporting to the police of violent offences in total rose from 37 per cent. in 1997 to 45 per cent. in the 2000 calendar year.
	The British Crime Survey has also shown that, in England and Wales as a whole, the number of violent crimes recorded in the survey decreased by 23 per cent. between the 1997 and 2000 calendar years, whereas violent crime recorded by the police increased by an estimated 14 per cent. Violent crime recorded by the police may therefore not necessarily be a reflection of real changes in the level of violent crime.
	Information relating to Scotland and Northern Ireland are matters for my right hon. Friends the Secretaries of State for Scotland and for Northern Ireland.
	
		Recorded violent crime1: number of offences from 1997 to 12 months ending March 2001
		
			 Area 1997 1998–992 1999–20002 2000–012 
		
		
			 Preston2 — — 1,705 1,695 
			 Blackburn with Darwen2 — — 1,423 1,996 
			 Lancashire 5,550 12,183 11,615 13,870 
			 North West of England 46,224 87,033 93,029 95,940 
			 Wales 20,071 34,770 40,580 40,822 
			 England and Wales 347,064 605,797 703,105 733,374 
		
	
	1 Violent crime is comprised of violence against the person, sexual offences, and robbery.
	2 Year ending March.
	3 These figures are at Crime & Disorder Reduction Partnership (CDRP) level.
	— No data available.

Police Numbers

Joan Ruddock: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will give a breakdown of police officers by gender and rank for each police force in England and Wales.

John Denham: The information requested was published in Home Office Statistical Bulletin No. 23/01, "Police Service Strength, England and Wales, 30 September 2001" and can be found in Table 3. A copy of the Bulletin is in the Library.
	
		Table 3: Police Officer Strength as at 30 September 2001 by police force area, rank and gender, and officers per 100,000 population -- England and WalesFull time equivalents1
		
			  Male Ranks  
			 Police force Chief Constables Assistant Chief Constables Superintendents Chief Inspectors Inspectors Sergeants Constables Total Male Ranks 
		
		
			 Avon and Somerset 1 3 23 29 135 411 1,971 2,573 
			 Bedfordshire 1 2 12 9 52 124 654 854 
			 Cambridgeshire 1 2 16 10 62 182 862 1,135 
			 Cheshire 1 3 13 24 95 289 1,241 1,666 
			 Cleveland 1 1 25 1 67 180 904 1,179 
			 Cumbria 1 1 9 13 44 152 664 883 
			 Derbyshire 1 3 17 22 87 249 1,179 1,558 
			 Devon and Cornwall 1 3 30 33 130 385 1,865 2,447 
			 Dorset 0 2 14 20 54 186 846 1,122 
			 Durham 1 2 18 19 74 199 981 1,294 
			 Essex 1 3 23 40 122 402 1,861 2,452 
			 Gloucestershire 1 2 11 14 55 154 701 937 
			 Greater Manchester 1 6 72 72 315 819 4,446 5,731 
			 Hampshire 1 3 34 35 157 479 2,121 2,830 
			 Hertfordshire 1 3 19 26 89 225 1,118 1,480 
			 Humberside 1 2 23 21 101 252 1,243 1,643 
			 Kent 1 4 29 33 139 432 2,069 2,707 
			 Lancashire 0 2 28 37 150 467 2,019 2,702 
			 Leicestershire 1 1 15 18 87 239 1,365 1,726 
			 Lincolnshire 1 2 9 15 61 169 751 1,008 
			 London, City of 3 1 2 9 12 48 100 433 605 
			 Merseyside 1 3 39 54 154 528 2,645 3,424 
			 Metropolitan Police2,3 6 23 205 355 1,174 3,669 15,927 21,359 
			 Norfolk 1 3 14 15 76 191 902 1,202 
			 Northamptonshire 1 2 13 7 55 148 741 967 
			 Northumbria 1 4 35 52 169 498 2,486 3,245 
			 North Yorkshire 1 3 12 13 62 206 869 1,166 
			 Nottinghamshire 1 3 21 24 116 323 1,411 1,899 
			 South Yorkshire 1 4 35 46 168 430 1,919 2,603 
			 Staffordshire 1 3 18 23 92 313 1,265 1,715 
			 Suffolk 1 1 12 14 50 151 717 946 
			 Surrey 1 2 15 20 74 248 1,280 1,640 
			 Sussex 0 4 29 38 145 411 1,707 2,334 
			 Thames Valley 1 2 46 34 179 473 2,320 3,054 
			 Warwickshire 1 3 13 11 42 109 602 781 
			 West Mercia 1 2 13 29 84 279 1,242 1,649 
			 West Midlands 1 3 58 40 257 922 4,484 5,765 
			 West Yorkshire 1 5 49 59 225 590 3,052 3,981 
			 Wiltshire 0 2 14 15 54 160 682 927 
			 Dyfed-Powys 1 2 12 19 49 166 681 930 
			 Gwent 1 2 10 15 55 196 818 1,097 
			 North Wales 1 2 13 28 67 218 914 1,243 
			 South Wales 1 4 26 35 151 401 2,095 2,713 
			 Total of all 43 forces 44 134 1,151 1,449 5,621 16,722 78,047 103,169 
			 NCS 1 2 18 28 80 182 767 1,078 
			 NCIS 1 3 5 24 26 59 128 246 
			 Other Secondments4 0 7 71 49 83 133 301 644 
			  
			 Total 2 12 94 101 189 374 1,196 1,968 
			  
			 Total police officer strength 46 146 1,245 1,550 5,810 17,096 79,243 105,137 
		
	
	
		
			  Female Ranks 
			 Police force Chief Constables Assistant Chief Constables Superintendents Chief Inspectors Inspectors Sergeants Constables Total Female Ranks 
		
		
			 Avon and Somerset 0 0 1 6 9 34 418 468 
			 Bedfordshire 0 0 3 2 5 12 174 196 
			 Cambridgeshire 0 0 0 0 4 17 194 215 
			 Cheshire 0 0 3 1 8 37 306 355 
			 Cleveland 0 1 0 1 5 16 233 256 
			 Cumbria 0 1 0 1 2 11 177 191 
			 Derbyshire 0 0 3 2 1 22 266 293 
			 Devon and Cornwall 0 0 1 1 11 43 469 525 
			 Dorset 1 0 0 2 5 19 212 239 
			 Durham 0 0 0 1 7 18 281 306 
			 Essex 0 0 3 3 8 45 427 486 
			 Gloucestershire 0 0 0 2 1 18 210 231 
			 Greater Manchester 0 0 4 14 31 116 1,141 1,306 
			 Hampshire 0 0 1 4 12 78 523 618 
			 Hertfordshire 0 0 1 2 11 33 316 363 
			 Humberside 0 0 0 1 8 16 323 348 
			 Kent 0 0 1 7 9 56 587 660 
			 Lancashire 1 1 3 4 15 50 511 585 
			 Leicestershire 0 1 2 2 3 22 306 336 
			 Lincolnshire 0 0 2 0 3 18 154 176 
			 London, City of 3 0 0 0 1 3 7 83 94 
			 Merseyside 0 0 3 3 21 64 580 671 
			 Metropolitan Police2,3 0 4 13 22 71 411 3,495 4,016 
			 Norfolk 0 0 1 3 3 23 205 234 
			 Northamptonshire 0 0 0 0 1 18 193 213 
			 Northumbria 0 0 4 2 12 41 590 648 
			 North Yorkshire 0 0 1 0 3 17 204 224 
			 Nottinghamshire 0 0 0 4 4 26 340 374 
			 South Yorkshire 0 0 4 1 14 68 534 620 
			 Staffordshire 0 0 1 2 5 29 367 404 
			 Suffolk 0 1 1 1 5 12 180 199 
			 Surrey 0 0 1 2 8 45 321 378 
			 Sussex 1 0 2 3 14 54 429 503 
			 Thames Valley 0 2 3 4 17 62 566 654 
			 Warwickshire 0 0 1 1 3 5 140 149 
			 West Mercia 0 1 3 1 10 25 305 345 
			 West Midlands 0 1 3 5 27 129 1,502 1,667 
			 West Yorkshire 0 0 4 3 17 68 786 878 
			 Wiltshire 1 0 1 1 3 17 203 225 
			 Dyfed-Powys 0 0 0 0 1 17 150 168 
			 Gwent 0 0 1 0 4 10 191 207 
			 North Wales 0 0 1 1 0 23 223 248 
			 South Wales 0 0 2 2 11 38 475 528 
			 Total of all 43 forces 4 13 78 117 413 1,885 19,289 21,800 
			 NCS 0 0 1 3 7 17 101 129 
			 NCIS 0 0 0 0 1 3 21 25 
			 Other Secondments4 0 0 2 7 14 27 90 139 
			  
			 Total 0 0 3 10 22 47 212 294 
			  
			 Total police officer strength 4 13 81 127 435 1,932 19,502 22,094 
		
	
	
		
			 Police Force Total Police Ranks Total officers per 100,000 population Total Constables Constables per 100,000 population 
		
		
			 Avon and Somerset 3,040 201.1 2,389 158.0 
			 Bedfordshire 1,050 185.6 828 146.4 
			 Cambridgeshire 1,350 184.8 1,056 144.7 
			 Cheshire 2,021 205.3 1,547 157.1 
			 Cleveland 1,434 257.6 1,136 204.1 
			 Cumbria 1,075 218.8 840 171.1 
			 Derbyshire 1,851 189.3 1,445 147.8 
			 Devon and Cornwall 2,972 187.3 2,334 147.1 
			 Dorset 1,360 194.8 1,057 151.4 
			 Durham 1,600 263.8 1,262 208.0 
			 Essex 2,937 180.3 2,287 140.4 
			 Gloucestershire 1,169 206.9 911 161.3 
			 Greater Manchester 7,036 272.1 5,586 216.0 
			 Hampshire 3,449 193.1 2,644 148.0 
			 Hertfordshire 1,843 175.4 1,434 136.5 
			 Humberside 1,991 226.0 1,566 177.8 
			 Kent 3,367 210.7 2,656 166.2 
			 Lancashire 3,288 230.0 2,529 176.9 
			 Leicestershire 2,062 219.6 1,671 178.0 
			 Lincolnshire 1,184 186.7 905 142.6 
			 London, City of 3 699 — 517 — 
			 Merseyside 4,095 291.8 3,225 229.8 
			 Metropolitan Police2,3 25,374 353.5 19,422 270.4 
			 Norfolk 1,436 178.6 1,107 137.6 
			 Northamptonshire 1,180 188.5 935 149.3 
			 Northumbria 3,893 275.3 3,075 217.5 
			 North Yorkshire 1,390 184.3 1,072 142.2 
			 Nottinghamshire 2,273 220.4 1,751 169.8 
			 South Yorkshire 3,223 247.6 2,453 188.4 
			 Staffordshire 2,119 199.9 1,632 154.0 
			 Suffolk 1,146 168.5 897 132.0 
			 Surrey 2,018 186.7 1,601 148.1 
			 Sussex 2,837 186.3 2,136 140.3 
			 Thames Valley 3,708 174.3 2,886 135.6 
			 Warwickshire 930 182.3 741 145.4 
			 West Mercia 1,994 173.9 1,546 134.8 
			 West Midlands 7,432 283.8 5,986 228.6 
			 West Yorkshire 4,859 229.0 3,838 180.9 
			 Wiltshire 1,152 187.8 885 144.2 
			 Dyfed-Powys 1,098 227.5 832 172.3 
			 Gwent 1,303 233.9 1,009 181.0 
			 North Wales 1,491 225.8 1,137 172.2 
			 South Wales 3,241 260.2 2,571 206.3 
			 Total of all 43 forces 124,969 236.0 97,337 183.9 
			 NCS 1,207  868  
			 NCIS 271  149  
			 Other Secondments4 783  391  
			
			 Total 2,261  1,408  
			  
			 Total police officer strength 127,231 240.3 100,153 182.4 
		
	
	1 This and other tables contain full-time equivalent figures that have been rounded to the nearest whole number. Because of rounding, there may be an apparent discrepancy between totals and the sums of the constituent items.
	2 The Commissioner, Deputy Commissioner and Assistant Commissioners are counted as Chief Constables.
	3 Officers per 100,000 population for City of London and Metropolitan Police are combined.
	4Secondments to Central Services and Inter-Force Units.

External Consultants

Pete Wishart: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department 
	(1)  which non-accounting and non-information technology external organisations have won new contracts with (a) his Department and (b) executive agencies in each year of the past five years;
	(2)  which non-accounting and non-information technology external organisations which previously held contracts with his Department (a) won new contracts at the culmination of the existing contracts and (b) won new contracts after a period of inactivity with his Department in each of the past five years;
	(3)  if he will list the 30 largest contracts awarded by his Department from (a) May 1997 to April 1998, (b) May 1998 to April 1999, (c) May 1999 to April 2000, (d) May 2000 to April 2001 and (e) May 2001 to the latest date, indicating in each case the values of the contracts and the companies with which the contracts were placed.

Angela Eagle: holding answer 28 February 2002
	The Home Department is unable to provide the level of detailed information sought on contracts and contract costs. Records are not held centrally and to collate and maintain a central register of contracts awarded across the Home Office and its Agencies would incur disproportionate costs.

TRANSPORT, LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND THE REGIONS

Car Auctions

Ivan Henderson: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions if he will list the statutory regulations that are in place to ensure that a minor cannot purchase a vehicle at a car auction; and what plans he has to review these regulations.

David Jamieson: There are no statutory regulations preventing a minor from purchasing a motor vehicle at auction although many auctioneers prevent minors from attending.
	Motor vehicles may be driven on private property by minors. Any vehicle driven on the road must be done so by the holder of an appropriate driving licence. The minimum age to drive a motor car is 17 years. Sixteen year olds are permitted to drive mopeds.
	In addition, legislation requires a vehicle to be properly licensed and registered. The annual licensing process incorporates a documentary check of a person's insurance cover and, where appropriate, the roadworthiness certificate also.

Technical Support Contracts (Rail Safety)

Tom Brake: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions if he will list the (a) title, (b) date of award, (c) length of contract, (d) cost, and (e) terms of reference of technical support framework agreements and research or other contracts awarded since (i) 1 May 1997 and (ii) 1 January 2001 by the Health and Safety Executive relating to support of the work of the HMRI on (A) railway safety cases and (B) rail accident investigation.

David Jamieson: Information provided by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) on their technical support and research contracts relating to railway safety cases and rail accident investigation has been placed in the Libraries of the House.
	Information about technical support contracts before January 2001 can only be provided at disproportionate costs.

Rail Delays

Don Foster: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions for what reason (a) his Department and (b) the Strategic Rail Authority do not (i) hold centrally, (ii) collate, (iii) make publicly available and (iv) place in the Library the total weekly rail delays, in minutes, caused by (A) Railtrack and (B) train operating companies as held by Railtrack.

David Jamieson: Information on train delays, week by week, is collected and managed by Railtrack and currently shared, as a commercial and operational matter, with the train operating companies. The SRA publishes the Public Performance Measure (PPM) which directly reports on the punctuality and reliability of trains.

Rail Services (South-West)

David Drew: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions 
	(1)  if he will investigate the rail franchise situation in the South West and Wessex in order to seek to clarify the operating strategy;
	(2)  if he will list the bidders for rail franchises in the South West and Wessex areas.

David Jamieson: As part of its revised franchising programme, the Strategic Rail Authority (SRA) announced that it would be looking at the longer term benefits of combining franchises, in particular where two or more operators share access to a London terminal. Accordingly, it is considering combining the Great Western and Thames franchises in 2006. The SRA launched a consultation on its proposals, and the future of the Wessex franchise, on 12 March.
	The SRA has signed Heads of Terms with Stagecoach for a new South West Trains franchise of up to 20 years.

Train Operating Companies

Don Foster: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions 
	(1)  which train operating companies have failed to fulfil their contractual commitments related to action plans; and what steps the Strategic Rail Authority has taken as a consequence;
	(2)  which train operating companies have failed to fulfil their contractual commitments related to action plans; and what steps the Strategic Rail Authority has taken as a consequence.

David Jamieson: Failure to meet contractual commitments is a potential breach of the train operator's franchise agreement. All breaches of franchise agreements, and the remedial action taken, are listed in the Strategic Rail Authority's Annual Reports, copies of which are in the Libraries of the House.

Train Operating Companies

John Redwood: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions how many new train sets have been ordered by train operating companies in England and Wales in (a) the last year and (b) the last three months.

John Spellar: Between 1 March 2001 and 28 February 2002, orders were placed for 1,267 new vehicles for entry into revenue passenger services across the National Rail network. 143 of these have been ordered since 1 December 2001.

Train Operating Companies

John Redwood: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions how many train operating companies have less than two years of their franchise left.

John Spellar: Five.

Rolling Stock

Don Foster: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions how many new rolling stock vehicles (a) were ordered and (b) entered service on Britain's railways between 25 February 1999 and 31 December 2001; and if he will state the proportion of rolling stock that were new or refurbished as of (i) 25 February 1999, (ii) 31 December 2001 and (iii) the latest available date.

David Jamieson: 1,352 new vehicles were ordered between 25 February 1999 and 31 December 2001. 1,045 new vehicles entered service between 1 January 1999 and 31 December 2001. Information on rolling stock refurbishments is not held centrally.

Rail Summit (Targets)

Don Foster: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions if the SRA reviews the delivery by train operating companies and other industry bodies of the commitments agreed to at the 1999 National Rail Summit.

David Jamieson: Many of the issues arising from the National Rail Summits are now being taken forward through the Strategic Rail Authority's Strategic Plan.

Train Drivers

Don Foster: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions, pursuant to his answer of 25 February 2002, Official Report, column 814W, on driver training, how many of those new drivers that have been recruited, but are not being trained, are (a) working in the industry and (b) due to begin training; and how many drivers have subsequently left the industry over the same period.

David Jamieson: The information is not available in the form requested. As of 5 January 2002, 10,542 drivers were working in the industry.

London Underground

Chris Grayling: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions what independent assessment he has carried out into the assumptions made by London Underground for the PPP business case.

David Jamieson: I refer the hon. Member to the answer given to my hon. Friend, the Member for Croydon Central (Geraint Davies), on 7 February 2002, Official Report, columns 1103–04W.

Great Western Mainline

Chris Grayling: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions for what reason the Great Western Mainline was excluded from the SRA Strategic Plan.

David Jamieson: The Great Western Main Line is not excluded from the Plan. Proposed incremental improvements are set out on page 67. The SRA's approach to major infrastructure improvements, including relative priorities, is set out in section 5 of the Plan.

Main Line Trains

Chris Grayling: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions what assessment he has made of the ability of main line trains to operate on the sub-surface lines in London.

David Jamieson: Studies were undertaken by both Railtrack and London Underground Limited in 1999 when they were discussing Railtrack's proposals for the sub-surface infrastructure company under the PPP. It was concluded that: such a proposal would provide no additional net capacity; it would give rise to substantial costs in restructuring infrastructure and rewriting contracts; and, the interworking of mainline and existing tube rolling stock would give rise to technical and operational difficulties. Railtrack's proposals were subsequently abandoned.

Railway Electrification

Chris Grayling: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions how many miles of railway have been electrified in each of the past 15 years.

David Jamieson: The number of electrified route kilometres open for traffic at the end of each year is as follows:
	
		
			 Year Electrified route kilometres 
		
		
			 1986–87 4,154 
			 1987–88 4,207 
			 1988–89 4,376 
			 1989–90 4,546 
			 1990–91 4,912 
			 1991–92 4,886 
			 1992–93 4,910 
			 1993–94 4,968 
			 1994–95 4,970 
			 1995–96 5,163 
			 1996–97 5,176 
			 1997–98 5,166 
			 1998–99 5,166 
			 1999–2000 5,167 
			 2000–01 5,167

Greater Manchester Upgrade

Chris Grayling: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions why the upgrade in Greater Manchester has been excluded from the SRA Strategic Plan.

David Jamieson: Page 98 of the Plan states:
	"The SRA, in partnership with Railtrack, GMPTE, Manchester International Airport and the Highways Agency, has completed the Greater Manchester Strategic Rail Study, which sets out a strategy for the development of the rail network in Greater Manchester over the next 20 years. The first key building block, the creation of a TransPennine Express franchise, is currently underway. The partners in the study are now considering how best to take forward longer term options."

Railway Overcrowding

Chris Grayling: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions how the Government's target for reducing overcrowding on the railways has changed since the publication of the 10-year plan.

David Jamieson: The overcrowding target has not changed since the publication of the 10-year plan.

Crossrail

Chris Grayling: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions for what reason Crossrail was (a) included in the 10-year plan and (b) excluded from the SRA Strategic Plan.

David Jamieson: A Crossrail link was included in the Government's 10-year plan given its potential for delivering increased peak capacity into London.
	Crossrail is also identified in the SRA's Strategic Plan as one of the major rail projects which are currently under development. Options for taking Crossrail forward are being developed by the SRA/Transport for London joint venture Cross London Rail Links Ltd.

Public-Private Partnership

Chris Grayling: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions in how many PPP agreements an accounting allowance for social cost benefit similar to that used by London Underground has been made.

David Jamieson: The relevant guidance from the Office of Government Commerce and Her Majesty's Treasury explain that, where appropriate, the factors captured by this allowance should be allowed for when evaluating the value for money of PPP-type schemes.

National Air Traffic Services

John Redwood: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions what the estimated level of capital investment by NATS is for (a) 2001–02 and (b) 2002–03; and what the figures were in (i) 1996–97 and (ii) 1999–2000.

John Spellar: The level of capital investment by NATS for 2001–02 is £72.8 million and is estimated at £90.7 million for 2002–03. The figures for 1996–97 and 1999–00 are £56.5 million and £52.0 million respectively.

National Air Traffic Services

John Redwood: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions what proportion of the anticipated investment by NATS over the next 10 years will come from the public sector.

John Spellar: NATS' investment over the next decade will be in excess of £1 billion, all of which will be financed by the private sector. I also refer the right hon. Member to the answer given by my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State on 25 February 2002, Official Report, column 807W.

Rail Freight

Joan Walley: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions what plans he has to increase the gauge of railways to take the larger piggyback containers.

David Jamieson: There are no current plans. The Strategic Rail Authority's preliminary studies suggest that the cost of enhancement of rail freight routes to permit the passage of lorry semi-trailers on flat railway wagons would not represent value for money.

Channel Tunnel Restrictions

John Barrett: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions what recent discussions he has had with the French Government regarding the SNCF Channel Tunnel restrictions.

David Jamieson: Ministers across Government are in frequent contact with the French authorities to press for urgent action to tackle the disruption to Channel Tunnel rail freight.

Channel Tunnel Restrictions

John Barrett: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions what impact the SNCF Channel Tunnel restrictions are having on congestion on United Kingdom roads.

David Jamieson: In the light of continued disruption to cross channel rail freight operations, more goods may have to be transported by road, so it is likely that road freight movements will marginally increase. There is no evidence to date that this is having any significant impact on congestion on UK roads.

Channel Tunnel Restrictions

John Barrett: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions what impact the SNCF Channel Tunnel restrictions are having on the United Kingdom economy.

David Jamieson: The Government recognise that the disruption caused by would-be illegal immigrants is causing severe hardship to many businesses in this country who depend on reliable freight services through the Channel Tunnel.
	We are pressing the French Government at the highest levels to ensure that sufficient policing resources are applied to address the problem so that normal freight services can resume as soon as possible.

Motor Vehicles

John Barrett: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions, pursuant to the answer of 6 March 2002, ref. 40023, on motor vehicles, if data are available for the Drylaw, Inch and Mayfield wards.

David Jamieson: Motor vehicle data for Drylaw, Inch and Mayfield wards are available under the pre-1996 definition of Scottish wards only. The number of motor vehicles registered to keepers with addresses in the wards is shown in the table. The totals include vehicles registered to companies and other entities as well as to individuals. The volume data are for December 2000.
	
		
			 Electoral Ward Number of Motor Vehicles 
		
		
			 Drylaw 2,732 
			 Inch 2,467 
			 Mayfield 3,067

Road Accidents (Fire Service)

Theresa May: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions 
	(1)  what is the average response time for the fire services to reach an accident on (a) a motorway and (b) an A-road, in each of the last three years;
	(2)  what the average length of time was which it took the fire services to complete all their official duties at an accident site on (a) an A-road and (b) a motorway in each of the last three years.

Stephen Byers: The information requested is not available centrally.

Road Accidents (Fire Service)

Theresa May: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions what duties the fire services have to carry out before an accident site can be cleared from (a)an A-road and (b) a motorway.

Stephen Byers: Under section 1(1) of the Fire Services Act 1947, it is the duty of the fire authority to make provision for fire-fighting purposes and, in particular, to secure for its area the services of a fire brigade and equipment to meet efficiently all normal requirements. Fire-fighting purposes is defined in the Act as "the purposes of the extinction of fires and the protection of life and property in case of fire". Under section 3(1)(e) of the Act the authority also has the power to use its brigade and equipment for purposes other than fire-fighting (which are commonly known as "special services"). Brigades attend road traffic accidents primarily for firefighting and rescue purposes. Operational procedures for dealing with road accidents are matters for fire authorities to determine locally in consultation with the relevant police authority.

Press Office

Theresa May: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions when Ian Jones was first informed of his suspension on full pay.

Stephen Byers: holding answer 11 March 2002
	Monday 4 March 2002.

Central Railway

Kelvin Hopkins: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions if he will make a statement on the proposal to build a freight railway by Central Railway Ltd.

John Spellar: holding answer 14 March 2002
	I have written to the Chairman of Central Railway informing him of my response to his request for support for a hybrid Bill as a means of authorising the company's proposed freight railway.
	The Government have made clear that we are committed to rail freight growth as a key element of sustainable distribution. To that end we will wish to support, in principle, projects that offer value for money in both the economic and environmental benefits they can bring to the country.
	In considering Central Railway's request for early Government support for a Bill to promote its own project, I have taken into account a number of factors and listened to representations from many interested parties. In our view there is not enough evidence at the moment to enable the Government to support a hybrid Bill for Central Railway's project.
	With the help of consultants and with the co-operation of Central Railway, the SRA will therefore carry out a further detailed assessment in order to test key remaining areas of the proposals. This is an essential piece of work if the Government are to be able to take an informed decision about Central Railway's hybrid Bill. The SRA anticipates that work to be completed by September.

Cleaner Vehicles Task Force

Shona McIsaac: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions when he will publish an updated Government response to the recommendations from the Cleaner Vehicles Task Force.

David Jamieson: I have today published an updated response detailing the actions that Government has taken in the last 12 months to advance the recommendations of the Cleaner Vehicles Task Force and to accelerate the take up of cleaner fuels and cleaner, more fuel-efficient vehicles. Copies have been placed in the Libraries in the House.

EDUCATION AND SKILLS

Accommodation Costs

John Bercow: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what the cost was of hotel accommodation for departmental staff working away from home in each of the last four years.

Ivan Lewis: The information is set out for the last three financial years, prior to that, the service was undertaken by a different provider and records are not available except at disproportionate cost.
	
		
			 Financial year Spend £ 
		
		
			 1998–99 823,567 
			 1999–2000 1,020,420 
			 2000–01 1,223,926

Unauthorised Absences

Theresa May: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many unauthorised absences there were in (a) state primary schools and (b) state secondary schools, broken down by each local education authority in England for each year since 1997.

Ivan Lewis: The number of half days missed due to unauthorised absences in (a) maintained primary schools and (b) maintained secondary schools by each local education authority in England since 1997 are shown in the table, copies of which have been placed in the Library.

Accountancy Contracts

Austin Mitchell: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills if she will list the contracts agreed by her Department with the five largest accountancy firms since May 1997; and what was the total value of contracts with each.

Ivan Lewis: This information could be supplied only at disproportionate cost.

Public Appointments

Fiona Mactaggart: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many appointments to public bodies have been made through her Department (a) from April 2000 to March 2001 and (b) since 31 March 2001; and how many of these were (i) men and (ii) women.

Ivan Lewis: holding answer 12 March 2002
	The numbers of men and women appointed or re-appointed to non-departmental public bodies sponsored by the former Department for Education and Employment and this Department during the periods in question are as follows:
	
		
			  Men Women 
		
		
			 April 2000 to March 2001 86 37 
			 April 2001 to March 2002 16 2

Regulatory Impact Unit

Matthew Taylor: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many members her Department employs in its Regulatory Impact Unit; and if she will make a statement.

Ivan Lewis: The Department employs one full-time member of staff in its Regulatory Impact Unit, with line management support when necessary.
	It is the job of the Departmental Regulatory Impact Unit to establish and promote the principles of good regulation in the Department. The Unit works closely with the officials responsible for developing policies in the Department and the Regulatory Impact Unit within the Cabinet Office. It focuses on those regulations that impact on business, charities and the voluntary sector.
	In addition there are 11 members of staff who working in the Small Business Service on better regulation for small business across Government.

Specialist Teachers

Candy Atherton: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many shortage-subject specialist teachers in primary schools were (a) PGCE primary trained and (b) PGCE secondary trained.

Stephen Timms: This information is not collected centrally.

Standards Fund

Annette Brooke: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills, pursuant to the answer of 27 February 2002, Official Report, columns 1293–96W, on the Standards Fund, what factors account for the difference between the allocations for the Standards Fund per pupil for Poole, Bournemouth and Dorset.

Stephen Timms: The Standards Fund is not allocated on a simple per pupil basis, but in relation to the specific priorities it is designed to support in each local education authority. Significant variances in the per pupil figures for Standards Fund are due to: grants where one authority is acting as a co-ordinator for others in its area; or grants allocated to particular types of school; and grants that are allocated to respond to needs, which may not be reflected equally in all authorities. The per pupil figure for each of these types of grants for Dorset, Poole and Bournemouth are shown in the following table:
	
		Main differences in Standards Fund per pupil
		
			 Grant Dorset £ per pupil Poole £ per pupil Bournemouth £ per pupil 
		
		
			 Regional coordination 
			 LEA Music Services 6 0 0 
			  Child Protection Co-ordinators   0 0 2 
			 Allocated by specific types of school 
			 Specialist Schools 18 8 17 
			 Small Schools Fund 17 2 2 
			 Specific needs based initiatives 
			 Induction of Newly Qualified Teachers 7 11 6 
			 Reducing Infant Class Sizes 42 21 94 
			 Fresh Start 0 0 110 
			 Information Management Strategy 5 3 0 
			 Classrooms of the Future 6 3 28 
			 School Laboratories 4 4 0 
			  
			 Total 104 54 260 
		
	
	For other Standards Fund grants the total per pupil distribution is: £244, £251 and £247 for Dorset, Poole and Bournemouth respectively. The smaller differences are due to variances in the level of free school meal eligibility and the balance between primary and secondary pupils.

School Admissions (Racial Equality)

Graham Brady: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what guidance she will make available to schools on the implementation of Commission for Racial Equality guidance that admissions should reflect the ethnic make-up of the community.

Stephen Timms: The Commission for Racial Equality will be issuing guidance to schools on how to comply with the general and specific duties as set out in the Race Relations (Amendment) Act 2000.

School Admissions (Racial Equality)

Graham Brady: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what assessment she has made of (a) which schools or categories of school are exempt from the Commission for Racial Equality guidance that school admissions should reflect the ethnic make-up of the community and (b) how the CRE guidance should be interpreted by admissions forums.

Stephen Timms: The guidance issued by the Commission for Racial Equality will apply to all maintained schools. It is the responsibility of individual admission authorities to ensure that their policies comply with all legislation, including the Race Relations Acts. Admission forums are advisory bodies and do not decide school admissions policies.

CULTURE MEDIA AND SPORT

Accountancy Contracts

Annabelle Ewing: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport if she will publish the (a) number and (b) value of contracts awarded by her Department to (i) Arthur Andersen, (ii) Deloitte Touche, (iii) Ernst and Young, (iv) KPMG and (v) PricewaterhouseCoopers accountants in each year since 1997.

Kim Howells: The following contracts are those awarded over the stated time period:
	
		
			  Date £ 
		
		
			 Deloitte Touche March 1999 227,000 
			 KPMG March 1999 23,000 
			 PricewaterhouseCoopers November 1999 67,000 
			 PricewaterhouseCoopers March 2000 56,000 
			 PricewaterhouseCoopers May 2001 22,000 
			 PricewaterhouseCoopers July 2001 96,000 
		
	
	Deloitte Touche is one of five companies who have framework agreements with DCMS for consultancy support to Quinquennial Reviews of DCMS funded bodies. These are not contracts as such, as any review work would be competed between the five companies and lead to an individual contract. Use of the framework agreements resolves some contractual issues and simplifies the tendering process. To date Deloitte Touche have not won any of the competitively tendered contracts under their agreement. The work awarded to the companies has, in the majority of cases, been research or consultancy work rather than accountancy.

Press Office

John Bercow: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport how many staff in his Department's press office have received (a) termination and (b) redundancy payments in each of the last four years.

Kim Howells: None of my Department's press office staff have received termination or redundancy payments in the last four years.

Design Champions

Bob Spink: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport 
	(1)  if she will list the composition of the Ministerial Design Champions Group; and if she will make a statement;
	(2)  if she will publish the terms of reference of the Ministerial Design Champions Group and its status in Government; and if she will make a statement.

Kim Howells: The Ministerial Design Champions Group is an inter-departmental working group of Ministers chaired by my noble Friend Lord Falconer of Thoroton on behalf of the Prime Minister. It comprises:
	Lord Falconer—Chair (DTLR; Baroness Blackstone (DCMS); Angela Eagle (Home Office); Elliot Morley (DEFRA); Brian Wilson (DTI); Malcolm Wicks (DWP); Andrew Smith (HM Treasury); Dr. Lewis Moonie (MOD); Baroness Ashton (DfES); Michael Wills (LCD); Lord Hunt (DOH); Denis MacShane (FCO); Chris Leslie (Cabinet Office), Mike Watson MSP (Scotland); Sue Essex AM (Wales); Dr. Sean Farren (NI); Sir Stuart Lipton (CABE).
	Each Ministerial Design Champion is expected to:
	(i) maintain a clear understanding of the extent and content of his/her Department's capital programme, including buildings and infrastructure; and the design implications of that programme in relation to the Government's wider objectives such as promotion of health, prevention of crime, urban regeneration and improvement of the environment;
	(ii) personally sponsor at least two projects within his/her Departmental remit in order to ensure his/her understanding of the issues and to drive home the message by example to other project sponsors and programme managers;
	(iii) oversee a departmental action plan to improve design quality across his/her department and sponsored bodies, ensuring that procedures encourage the achievement of high design quality and that sufficient resources are allocated to the production of the plan and the delivery of its conclusions;
	(iv) encourage a commitment to Better Public Buildings by all Ministers, officials and others who have influence over building works under his/her Department's authority; and
	(v) ensure that high quality design is part of an efficient and effective procurement process, under HM Treasury's Achieving Excellence initiative and DETR's Rethinking Construction initiative.

Design Champions

Bob Spink: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport 
	(1)  when the Ministerial Design Champions Group will next meet; and if she will make a statement;
	(2)  when the Ministerial Design Champions Group last met; and if she will make a statement.

Kim Howells: The Ministerial Design Champions Group last met on 17 January 2002; it will next meet on 22 May 2002.

Public Appointments

Fiona Mactaggart: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport how many appointments to public bodies have been made through her Department (a) from April 2000 to March 2001 and (b) since 31 March 2001; and how many of these were (i) men and (ii) women.

Tessa Jowell: holding answer 12 March 2002
	The number of men and women appointed, or re-appointed, by Ministers in this Department to bodies sponsored by this Department during the periods in question is as follows:
	
		
			 Period Men Appointed Women appointed 
		
		
			 1.4.00–31.3.01 101 52 
			 1.4.01–28.2.02 102 53 
		
	
	This includes appointments to bodies sponsored by my Department where my role is to advise on appointments made by the Prime Minister or, through him, by Her Majesty The Queen. It does not include appointments made to former Home Office public bodies before the Machinery of Government changes in June 2001.

National Gallery/National Portrait Gallery

Anne Begg: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what progress has been made on the joint review of the National Gallery and National Portrait Gallery.

Kim Howells: My right hon. and noble Friend the Minister for the Arts has today published the second stage report of the joint review of the National Gallery and National Portrait Gallery.
	The report underlines the value of both galleries and the contribution they make to this country's cultural life. Both galleries have achieved a great deal in the last few years and have risen to the challenges set by government and themselves.
	The report also finds the need for a closer, more strategic relationship between the galleries and the Department.
	A copy of the report has been placed in the Libraries of both Houses.

LORD CHANCELLOR

Solicitors

Gareth Thomas: To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department how many complaints his Department has received about the conduct and quality of solicitors' performance in each of the last 10 years.

Rosie Winterton: Complaints made to the Lord Chancellor's Department about solicitors can come up in many different contexts and no information is kept centrally about the number that relate to quality, conduct or any other matters. Concerns raised in correspondence are monitored. The Lord Chancellor's Department is not responsible for handling formal complaints against solicitors. This is the responsibility of the Law Society and its complaints-handling wing, the Office for the Supervision of Solicitors.

Solicitors

Gareth Thomas: To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department what action he is taking to measure the performance of and quality of service offered by solicitors.

Rosie Winterton: The legal profession is self-regulating. The conduct of solicitors is a matter for their professional body, the Law Society. The Office for the Supervision of Solicitors (OSS) is a separate organisation, set up by the Law Society, to handle complaints against its solicitors.
	The Lord Chancellor's Department Ministers, among others, are sent the OSS monthly digest of performance.
	The OSS is subject to independent scrutiny by the Legal Services Ombudsman, Ms Ann Abraham. The Ombudsman, who is a lay person, may consider complaints about the decisions reached by the OSS and also has the power to investigate the original complaint. The Ombudsman is required to make an annual report to the Lord Chancellor on the discharge of her functions during the year to which the report relates. In her report the Ombudsman will also bring to the attention of the Lord Chancellor any wider concerns she has about the nature and level of complaints against members of the legal profession. A copy of this report is laid before each House of Parliament.

ENVIRONMENT FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS

Correspondence

Marion Roe: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs 
	(1)  when she will reply to the letters from the hon. Member for Broxbourne of 4 September, 5 October, 2 November and 29 November relating to correspondence from the East Anglian Region of the National Farmers Union.
	(2)  when the hon. Member for Broxbourne will receive a reply to her letters of 4 September, 5 October, 2 November, 29 November 2001 and 2 January 2002 relating to correspondence from the East Anglian region of the National Farmers Union.

Elliot Morley: holding answers 6 December 2001 and 14 January 2002
	A reply was sent on 10 January to the hon. Member.

Environment Council

Michael Connarty: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what the outcome was of the Environment Council on 4 March; what the Government's stance was on the issues discussed, including its voting record; and if she will make a statement.

Margaret Beckett: I represented the UK at Environment Council on 4 March, accompanied by my right hon. Friend the Minister for the Environment, and the Minister for the Environment in the Welsh Assembly Government, Sue Essex. This was the first Environment Council of the Spanish Presidency. A Council decision on ratification of the Kyoto Protocol was agreed; the UK voted in favour. Four sets of Council Conclusions were adopted. Council also held a public debate exploring key aspects of a recently adopted Commission proposal for a directive establishing a regime for environmental liability.
	The agreement of the Council decision on ratification of the Kyoto Protocol will enable the Community and member states to ratify the Protocol in time for it to enter into force before the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) in August, subject to sufficient ratifications by other signatories. A legal base requiring a qualified majority (Article 175(1) of the Treaty) was agreed for the decision; at the UK's request a recital was added making clear that the legal base chosen for this decision should not be taken as a precedent for future decisions on burden-sharing. A declaration was also agreed noting Council's intention to agree future burden-sharing decisions by consensus. Council also adopted Conclusions reacting to the US climate change plan. These included a call upon Parties to the UN framework Convention on Climate Change—including the US—to live up to their responsibilities under the Convention, and a confirmation of the EU's willingness to continue dialogue through the EU-US High Level Group.
	In preparation for WSSD, Council Conclusions were adopted setting out the EU's priorities including poverty eradication, access to safe drinking water and sanitation, and ways of giving special attention to Africa. Council reaffirmed the Gothenburg commitment to reach the UN target for official development assistance of 0.7 per cent of GDP and called for integration of sustainable development in bilateral and multilateral co-operation agreements. Council welcomed the Commission communication "Towards a Global Partnership for Sustainable Development" and its proposals for the components of a Global Deal at the Summit. The Conclusions identified EU actions in the run up to Johannesburg and beyond including the early ratification of several international environmental agreements. The Conclusions also stressed the need for integration and coherence of internal and external policies to ensure that the EU's economic, social and environmental objectives were mutually supportive and that the EU effectively contributed to sustainable development at all levels. The global dimension should be regularly addressed as part of the overall Sustainable Development package at Spring meetings of the European Council.
	Council also agreed Conclusions on the EU Sustainable Development Strategy, to be submitted to the Barcelona European Council. The Conclusions took note of the Commission's synthesis report for 2002 and stressed the need to reflect environmental issues more extensively and to treat the three dimensions of sustainable development in a more balanced way. Council called on the Commission to put in place a system of Sustainability Impact Assessment as soon as possible and emphasised the importance of the EU becoming a highly eco-efficient economy.
	Council Conclusions were adopted setting out the EU negotiating position for the Sixth Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity, taking place in the Hague between 7–19 April. The Conclusions stressed the need for early ratification by the Community and member states of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety and the International Treaty on Plan Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Council also supported the preparation of an action plan for capacity-building for access to genetic resources and benefit-sharing. The Conclusions also called for increased co-ordination between international organisations and conventions, including the World Intellectual Property Organisation Inter-Governmental Committee, and the United Nations Commission on Trade and Development (UNCTAD).
	In the public debate on the proposed environmental liability regime, principal concerns expressed by other member states were the generous extent of the defences available to polluters, the potential burden on member states if polluters failed to act, and the scope of the directive. Several member states thought that there was a need to consider whether there was a gap in the proposed regime concerning damage caused by genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Beyond this, member states were evenly divided on whether the scope should be extended and on the need for a common framework for insurance. I underlined the complex nature of the proposal and the need to take on board the views of stakeholders. I argued that we would need careful examination of the associated costs and benefits of any proposed change to its scope, the defences or insurance arrangements.
	The Spanish Presidency gave progress reports on a proposed directive establishing a Community greenhouse gas trading scheme; amendments to Directive 94/62/EC, concerning recycling and recovery targets for packaging and packaging waste; and amendments to Directive 96/82/EC, on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances (SEVESO II). The Commission presented proposals allowing Community implementation and ratification of the Cartegena Protocol on Biosafety. The Commission also updated Council on progress on chemicals legislation, a proposed directive on recycling of batteries and accumulators, and a proposed White Paper on integrated product policy.
	Under Any Other Business, Spain reported on the outcome of a recent seminar considering the incorporation of gender perspectives into EU environmental policy-making. Austria reported on an international conference held in November 2001 on the role of the precautionary principle in chemicals policy. Germany invited Ministers to consider the environmental implications of the proposed airport noise directive currently under discussion in Transport Council. My right hon. Friend, the Minister for the Environment, noted that two recent studies had suggested a connection between transport and asthma in children. Contributory causes appeared to be ozone, particulates and nitrogen oxides. The Commission welcomed the dissemination of the research, and noted that it would shortly publish a Communication on children's health and the environment.

Technetium-99

David Chaytor: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if she will make a statement on the Environment Agency's proposal in respect of technetium-99 discharges; what process she has established to consider representations on the proposal; and when she expects to take a decision in respect of the proposal.

Michael Meacher: holding answer 11 March 2002
	In 1998, in the light of international concern about discharges of technetium-99 from BNFL's Sellafield site, Ministers requested that the Agency carry out a review of discharges of this radionuclide on a "fast track". In February 2000, the Agency published its "Scope and Methodology Document", describing its plans for the re-examination of radioactive discharge authorisations at Sellafield, including technetium-99, and sought public comment. In November 2000 the Agency published its "Explanatory Document" setting out its analysis of the situation concerning technetium-99 discharges, abatement technologies and a range of future approaches that might be taken. Public consultation on this document finished on 5 March 2001. The Agency took into account the responses that it had received and, in September 2001, published its proposed decisions on the future regulation of technetium-99 discharges. My right hon. Friends the Secretary of State and the Secretary of State for Health will give a decision on this shortly.

Rural Work Force

Malcolm Bruce: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what proportion of those employed in agriculture are classified as having another form of paid employment; and if she will make a statement.

Paul Boateng: I have been asked to reply.
	The information requested falls within the responsibility of the National Statistician. I have asked him to reply.
	Letter from Len Cook to Malcolm Bruce, dated 15 March 2002
	As National Statistician, I have been asked to reply to your Parliamentary Question about the proportion of those employed in agriculture who have another form of paid employment. (42905)
	Of the 402,000 people shown by the Labour Force Survey to be employed in agriculture, 8 per cent had a job in another industrial sector also. The attached table shows details of the make up of this groups of people.
	
		Proportion of people employed in agriculture1 who have another job in a different industry; United Kingdom; autumn (September to November) 2001; not seasonally adjusted
		
			  Thousands Per cent. 
		
		
			 All persons whose main job is in agriculture 383 100.0 
			 of which:   
			 those with a second job, in a different industry 13 3.3 
			 All persons with a second job in agriculuture 24 100.0 
			 of which: 
			 those whose main job is in a different industry 20 80.6 
			 Total employed in agriculture, either as their main or second job 402 100.0 
			 of which: 
			 those with another job, in a different industry 32 8.0 
		
	
	1 People employed in Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) 1992 Division A: Agriculture, hunting and forestry.
	Source: ONS Labour Force Survey

TREASURY

Accountancy and Consultancy Costs

Matthew Taylor: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what the total cost to his Department has been of services provided by (a) Arthur Andersen and (b) Accenture and Andersen Consulting for (i) accountancy services, (ii) consultancy work and (iii) other work in each year since 1997; and if he will make a statement.

Ruth Kelly: The cost to the Treasury for consultancy services provided by Arthur Andersen was £80,000 in 2000 and £64,625 in 2001, and for Andersen Consulting £30,252 in 2000. Aside from inward secondees, no other services have been received from these firms in the last four years.

Afghan Heroin

Jim Murphy: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what actions HM Customs and Excise are taking to increase the proportion of Afghan heroin seized; and how many tonnes of Afghan heroin have been seized by Customs and Excise in each of the past 10 years.

Paul Boateng: Customs work closely with other agencies in the UK and overseas to disrupt the supply of heroin to the UK market, the vast majority of which originates in Afghanistan. Statistics relating to the annual amounts of heroin seized by Customs are published on a routine basis in their annual departmental reports, but these are not disaggregated by their country of origin.

Running Costs (Government)

Hugo Swire: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will provide a breakdown of the total running costs of central Government and their agencies for each year sine May 1997 to the latest date for which information is available.

Andrew Smith: holding answer 7 March 2002
	Table 5.1 of PESA 2001–02 (Public Expenditure Statistical Analyses, Cm 5101) and similar tables in previous PESAs give outturn data department by department for administration costs (running costs before 2000–01) since 1986–87, the first year for which there is published data.

Terrorism (Costs)

Bob Spink: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will estimate the total direct and indirect cost to the UK of actions taken by the UK arising from the attacks on the USA on 11 September 2001.

Andrew Smith: Funds have been approved by Parliament in the normal way in Supplementary Estimates. The Chancellor of the Exchequer gave details of additional public spending arising from attacks on the USA on 11 September 2001 in his Pre-Budget Report Statement to Parliament on 27 November 2001.

Gladwyn's Wood

Dominic Grieve: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer 
	(1)  what discussions his Department has had with the Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions concerning the future of Gladwyn's Wood, Denham, Buckinghamshire, with reference to its contiguity with Broadspring Wood, owned by the Highways Agency;
	(2)  if Gladwyns Wood, Denham, Buckinghamshire, is now in the ownership of HM Customs and Excise; and what plans his Department has for the wood.

Paul Boateng: None. Gladwyn Wood is not in the ownership of HM Customs and Excise.

Approved Mileage Allowance Payments

Jackie Lawrence: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will make a statement about the entitlement of service company workers and others to tax relief and exemption under the Approved Mileage Allowance Payments scheme.

Dawn Primarolo: Draft legislation is being published today which will ensure that from 6 April 2002, people who work through intermediaries, such as service companies, and who fall within the "intermediaries legislation", will be entitled to the same relief and exemption under the new Approved Mileage Allowance Payments scheme as employees. Copies of the draft legislation are available in the Libraries of the House.

HEALTH

Physiotherapy

Gareth Thomas: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what action he is taking to improve physiotherapy services (a) in London and (b) in general.

John Hutton: The NHS Plan sets out targets to provide 6,500 more therapists and other health professionals and 4,450 more therapists and other key health professional training places by 2004. Further plans to increase the number of physiotherapists working in the NHS by 59 per cent., from 15,600 in 2000 to 24,800 in 2009, were announced in the follow-up document to the NHS Plan, Investment and reform for NHS staff—taking forward the NHS Plan, (published 15 February 2001).
	Between 1999 and 2001 the number of qualified physiotherapists in England increased by 1,140 (from 15,070 in 1999 to 16,210 in 2001). Of these the number working in the London regional office area increased by 90.
	Between 1999–2000 and 2000–01 the number of physiotherapy training commissions increased by 127 (9 per cent.) and further increases are planned.
	In September 2001, as signalled in Meeting the Challenge: A Strategy for the Allied Health Professions (AHPs), 10 Workforce Development Confederations (WDC's) began working with 13 Higher Education Institutions in a first wave of modernising pre-registration education and training for the allied health professions, starting with Physiotherapy, Occupational Therapy, Radiography, Podiatry and Speech & Language Therapy education. These first wave courses will be established from the 2002–03 academic year and will feature wider entry gates to professional training, more part-time courses, the possibility of stepping on and off programmes, and more opportunities for shared learning. Several HEIs in England offer accelerated pre-registration courses in physiotherapy for existing graduates.
	Individual health authorities are also responsible for assessing the broad health care needs of their population, and securing a range of hospital and community health services such as physiotherapy services to meet those needs. Decisions about the health care provision and the use of resources are best taken at local level because it is there that people's needs are best known and services can be tailored accordingly.

Orthodontists (Mid Essex Hospital Trust)

Simon Burns: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many (a) part-time and (b) full-time orthodontists there are in the Mid Essex Hospital Trust area.

Hazel Blears: holding answer 5 March 2002
	There are fewer than five full or part-time orthodontists in the Mid Essex NHS Trust area. Exact figures cannot be provided as for data protection purposes national figures are collated on the basis that individuals will not be identified, and figures are sufficiently small to risk disclosure of information about an individual.

Pharmacists

Laurence Robertson: To ask the Secretary of State for Health 
	(1)  what plans he has to increase the numbers of people training as pharmacists; and if he will make a statement;
	(2)  what discussions he has had with companies about the training of pharmacists; and if he will make a statement.

John Hutton: holding answer 7 March 2002
	There has been a significant increase in pharmacy student intakes over recent years, with 27 per cent. more new students starting their training in 2000 than in 1993. This points to a significant medium-term growth in the pharmacy work force, despite the change to a 4-year undergraduate course in 1997. Full figures are not yet available from the Pharmaceutical Society for 2001 as returns are still awaited from two schools of pharmacy. Work force modelling undertaken by the Department suggests that there will be a 12 per cent. increase in the pharmacy work force across the National Health Service and private sector between 1998 and 2003.
	The Department has regular contact with a range of organisations with an interest in pharmacy, to discuss training issues.

NHS Staff (Assaults)

Paul Burstow: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what figures he uses to monitor the NHS zero tolerance campaign on assaults on NHS staff.

John Hutton: holding answer 8 March 2002
	The National Health Service's zero tolerance zone campaign to tackle violence against NHS staff is monitored using data collected from all NHS trusts and health authorities to a common definition issued in Health Service Circular 1999/229: "Working Together, Securing a Quality Workforce for the NHS: Managing Violence, Accidents and Sickness Absence in the NHS", a copy of which is in the Library.
	Figures on reported violent incidents in 2000–01 are currently being analysed by the Department and will form the baseline for measuring progress against the Government's national improvement targets.

Radiographers

Tim Loughton: To ask the Secretary of State for Health if he will list vacancy rates and full role calculations for radiographer posts by hospital trust.

John Hutton: holding answer 11 March 2002
	The information requested has been placed in the Library.

Health Costs (Road Accidents)

James Gray: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what action he proposes to take to recover health service charges from uninsured drivers.

Hazel Blears: holding answer 13 March 2002
	It is already possible for National Health Service costs to be recovered from the Motor Insurers' Bureau in cases where the driver is uninsured for accidents that occur on or after 5 April 1999.

Health Costs (Road Accidents)

James Gray: To ask the Secretary of State for Health 
	(1)  what his reasons are for the extent of the proposed increase in threshold for the upper limit that can be charged to insurance companies for the costs of health care for people injured in road accidents;
	(2)  for what reasons he withdrew the regulations to increase the threshold for the upper limit that can be charged to insurance companies for the costs of health care for people injured in road accidents;
	(3)  how many hospital charges exceeded £30,000 in the last 12 months for which figures are available.

Hazel Blears: holding answer 14 March 2002
	Regulations were introduced on 28 January 2002 that increased the tariff and ceiling of charges for the recovery of National Health Services costs following road traffic accidents. The tariff was increased from a flat rate of £354 to £402 for treatment without admission and from a daily rate of £435 to £494 for treatment with admission. The ceiling of charges in any one case was increased from £10,000 to £30,000. The regulations were revoked on 7 February 2002 following representations from and on behalf of the insurance industry that they were not given adequate warning of the intended increases.
	The increase in the ceiling of charges in any one case was proposed in the light of operational experience. Although the new scheme was intended to recover the full cost of treatment in the relevant cases a threshold had always existed but had failed to keep pace with the rising cost of medical treatment. Our data for the year from 1 February 2001 to 31 January 2002 show that 1,237 patients received treatment following a road traffic accident which cost in excess of £10,000 with 248 of these costing in excess of £30,000.
	We will shortly be consulting on revised proposals for increasing the tariff and ceiling of charges.

Health Costs (Road Accidents)

James Gray: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what consultations he has had with the Automobile Association on increases in the threshold for the upper limit that can be charged to insurance companies for the costs of health care for people injured in road accidents.

Hazel Blears: The Department of Health will shortly be consulting on proposals for increasing the tariff and ceiling of charges for the recovery of National Health Service costs following a road traffic accident. The Automobile Association will be included in the consultation.

Free Prescriptions

Laurence Robertson: To ask the Secretary of State for Health if he will list the medical complaints which provide entitlements to free prescriptions; and if he will make a statement.

Hazel Blears: The medical conditions conferring exemption from prescription charges are:
	(1) permanent fistula (including caecostomy, colostomy, laryngostomy, or ileostomy) requiring continuous surgical dressing or an appliance;
	(2) the following disorders:
	—forms of hypoadrenalism (including Addison's disease) for which specific substitution therapy is essential;
	—diabetes insipidus and other forms of hypopituitarism;
	—diabetes mellitus—except where treatment is by diet alone;
	—hypoparathyroidism;
	—myasthenia gravis; and
	—myxoedema;
	(3) epilepsy requiring continuous anti-convulsive therapy;
	(4) a continuing physical disability which prevents the patient from leaving his residence without the help of another person.

Free Prescriptions

Laurence Robertson: To ask the Secretary of State for Health if he will exempt sufferers of cystic fibrosis from paying prescription charges; and if he will make a statement.

Hazel Blears: Our policy is to give priority to helping people who may have difficulty in paying charges, rather than extending the exemption arrangements to people with other medical conditions, including cystic fibrosis.

FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH AFFAIRS

Indonesia

Ann Clwyd: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what assessment he has made of (a) the sufficiency of the territorial and temporal jurisdiction of the human rights court established in Indonesia to investigate alleged abuses in East Timor, (b) the likely impact of the Indonesian constitutional prohibition on retroactive prosecutions, (c) the experience, expertise and independence of the judges and lawyers appointed to the court, (d) the arrangements for the protection of victims and witnesses and (e) the level of co-operation on legal matters between the Indonesian and East Timorese authorities; and what plans he has to monitor the trials.

Ben Bradshaw: (a) The question of the territorial and temporal jurisdiction of Indonesia's ad hoc human rights tribunals is a matter for the President of Indonesia to determine. The UK considers that their mandate should encompass all crimes against humanity perpetrated in East Timor before, during and after the Referendum of 1999. We will continue to raise our concerns about the jurisdictional limitations of the Tribunal with the Indonesian authorities, working closely with our partners in the EU.
	(b) The question of retroactive prosecutions will be for the Tribunal to determine.
	(c) The judges and prosecutors appointed to the Tribunal are professional lawyers. We welcome their appointment.
	(d) There is currently no provision for victim/witness protection under Indonesian law. However, it is expected that this will be included in forthcoming legislation.
	(e) The Indonesian Government and representatives from the UN Transitional Administration to East Timor (UNTAET) and the East Timorese leadership meet regularly to discuss a range of bilateral issues. They met most recently on 25 February.

Relocation expenses

John Bercow: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what his policy is on the payment of relocation expenses to staff in his Department.

Ben Bradshaw: If staff are permanently transferred within the UK in the interests of the FCO, they are helped with additional travel costs or the costs of moving home only if their home is no longer within normal commuting distance.

Litigation

Andrew Turner: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how many cases (a) his Department and (b) its agencies have defended in (i) industrial tribunals and (ii) the courts in each year since 1997; how many were concluded in their favour; and what the total cost to his Department of litigation was in each year.

Ben Bradshaw: Cases defended by the FCO in Industrial Employment Tribunals:
	1998: four cases defended, three decided in FCO's favour;
	1999: three cases defended; all decided in FCO's favour;
	2000: two cases defended; one case fully, one case partially in FCO's favour; total cost £16,811;
	2001: five cases defended; two in FCO's favour*; total cost £100,461;
	2002: one case defended; one in FCO's favour; total cost £1,373.
	* Two cases from 2001 are still awaiting a decision. The information available on cases brought in courts other than Industrial/Employment Tribunals, on all cases prior to 1998, and cost information prior to 2000, can only be provided at disproportionate cost.

Zimbabwe

Graham Brady: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, pursuant to his answer of 5 March 2002, Official Report, column 208W, on Zimbabwe what estimate his Department has made of the number of British citizens owed public sector pensions in relation to service in Rhodesia/Zimbabwe who are resident in the United Kingdom and whose pension payments have been suspended.

Denis MacShane: The Foreign and Commonwealth Office does not hold a record of British Citizens resident in the UK who are former public sector employees of the Rhodesian authorities and entitled to pension payments in respect of their service. Nor does it hold a record of those pensioners whose pension payments have been delayed or suspended by the Zimbabwean authorities.

Deena Gilbey

Bob Spink: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what action the Government have taken to assist Deena Gilbey in her attempt to stay in the USA with her children.

Ben Bradshaw: The Government have worked tirelessly on behalf of Mrs. Gilbey and the other British family members of victims of the 11 September atrocities. The British Embassy in Washington has worked with the White House, the State Department and Congress to ensure the fair and sympathetic treatment of British family members whose immigration or residency status in the US may have been affected by the terrorist attacks. The British Ambassador in Washington raised these cases with the Chair of the US Senate Judiciary Committee on 9 October 2001. Following this, the US Congress passed, and President Bush signed, anti-terrorism legislation (the Patriots Bill) that allows all British family members affected by 11 September to continue living and working in the US.
	The US Immigration and Naturalisation Service have assured Mrs. Gilbey that does not face deportation.
	The British Consulate General in New York remains in close touch with Mrs. Gilbey, and continues to monitor the situation closely, to ensure that she and others in a similar position do not have to suffer any further.

Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh

Harry Cohen: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs when he expects Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh to be put on trial; and if he will make a statement.

Ben Bradshaw: We are in contact with the Pakistani authorities about Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh. We understand that they have not completed their investigations or made a decision about trial proceedings. We will continue to monitor this case closely.

Angola

Elfyn Llwyd: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs 
	(1)  what representations he has made to the Angolan Government concerning restrictions on freedom of expression; and if he will make a statement;
	(2)  if representations are being made to the Angolan Government against their continued military offensive against UNITA; and if he will make a statement on what is being done by the international community to achieve new momentum in the peace process;
	(3)  what the British Government have done to show their condemnation of human rights abuses by (a) the UNITA rebel movement and (b) the ruling MPLA Government in Angola; and if he will make a statement.

Denis MacShane: Following the death of Jonas Savimbi, the UK joined the EU partners in issuing a declaration urging both parties to put an end to the conflict in Angola. The Prime Minister has written to President dos Santos to encourage him to take steps to begin a process of national reconciliation and to address Angola's very serious humanitarian situation.
	Her Majesty's Government believe that freedom of expression is essential to a functioning democracy. It is important for the improvement of human rights in Angola. The UK makes regular representations to the Government of Angola, bilaterally and through the EU, urging them to address human rights and humanitarian issues in Angola. We condemn human rights abuses by UNITA. UK support for sanctions against UNITA is a strong signal that their behaviour has been unacceptable.
	The next opportunity for HMG to discuss Angola's human rights record will be the visit of Foreign Minister Miranda to the UK at the end of March, when he will meet the Foreign Secretary, Baroness Amos and the International Development Secretary. The International Development Secretary is also visiting Angola from 2–4 April.

Burma

John MacDougall: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent discussions he has had with the authorities in Burma regarding the situation of Aung San Suu Kyi.

Ben Bradshaw: Ministerial contact with the Burmese authorities is limited by the EU Common Position. However an FCO official visited Rangoon from 27 February–1 March where he met both Aung San Suu Kyi and members of the Burmese Government. The Burmese Government are aware of our view that all restrictions on ASSK should be removed. An EU Troika mission is visiting Rangoon from 13–15 March to gauge the latest developments and explain EU policy.

Non-governmental Organisations

Adrian Sanders: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, pursuant to his answer of 6 March 2002, ref 39187, on non-governmental organisations, what information he collates on the funding of non-governmental organisations by his Department, with particular reference to those operating on a regional level; and if he will make a statement.

Jack Straw: The FCO does not keep information centrally about the funding of NGOs and nor do FCO Commands keep that information broken down on a regional basis. It would be difficult to arrive at a precise answer because the FCO could be said to "fund" NGOs in a great variety of ways—some are contracted to provide specific services in relation to projects funded by Command Programme Budgets and specific Programme funds (e.g. Human Rights Project Fund), others may well receive financial support to attend conferences etc as guests of HMG. In some cases posts overseas may use local budgets to pay, for example, for accommodation of NGO visitors on official business.

UK Citizens (France)

David Stewart: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how many United Kingdom citizens are held (a) on remand and (b) in custody following convictions within France.

Ben Bradshaw: There are currently 65 British citizens held on remand in France and 105 British citizens who have been convicted and are serving prison sentences in France.

UK Citizens (France)

David Stewart: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how many United Kingdom lorry drivers are held (a) on remand and (b) in prison following conviction in France.

Ben Bradshaw: There are currently 26 British lorry drivers held on remand in prison in France and 19 British lorry drivers who have been convicted and are serving prison sentences in France.

EU Enlargement

David Stewart: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent discussions he has had with the Governments of (a) Poland, (b) Hungary, (c) the Czech Republic and (d) Slovenia on EU enlargement.

Peter Hain: Both my right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary and I have regular discussions with candidate countries about their accession to the EU. As part of this dialogue I visited Hungary in September 2001 and the Czech Republic and Slovenia in January and will visit Warsaw later this month.

Public Appointments

Fiona Mactaggart: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how many appointments to public bodies have been made through his Department (a) from April 2000 to March 2001 and (b) since 31 March 2001; and how many of these were (i) men and (ii) women.

Ben Bradshaw: holding answer 12 March 2002
	The number of men and women appointed, or re-appointed, by Ministers in this Department to bodies sponsored by this Department during the periods in question is as follows:
	
		
			 Period Men appointed Women appointed 
		
		
			 1.4.00–31.3.01 21 6 
			 1.4.01–28.2.02 22 9

United Nations

Ian Lucas: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how many full-time equivalent staff are employed at the United Kingdom Mission to the United Nations.

Denis MacShane: There are 48 UK-based staff and 18.75 LE staff.

Freedom of Information Act

Matthew Taylor: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, pursuant to his answer of 21 November 2001, Official Report, column 332W, on the Freedom of Information Act 2000, on what dates the steering group of senior officials has met since August 2000.

Denis MacShane: The FCO's steering group of senior officials met on 13 September and 6 December 2001. It will next meet on 20 March.
	In addition officials at working group level continue to meet regularly to review progress.

India and Pakistan (Nuclear Programmes)

Andrew Love: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what the Government's policy is regarding (a) exports to nuclear and nuclear-related end users in India and Pakistan and (b) contacts with India and Pakistan relating to their nuclear programmes.

Ben Bradshaw: As the then Foreign Office Minister of State, my hon. Friend the Member for Manchester, Central (Mr. Lloyd) made clear on 10 July 1998, Official Report, column 687, many countries including the UK have in place strict controls on the export of nuclear-related goods to India and Pakistan. The UK also exercises caution over contacts between personnel from the British nuclear industry and their Indian and Pakistani counterparts. Current tensions between India and Pakistan demonstrate the need for both countries to exercise restraint.
	The events of 11 September highlighted the fact that some terrorist groups will use any means to achieve their ends. We know that Osama bin Laden and the al-Qaeda network have shown an interest in developing chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. To ensure that such ambitions are not realised, we are encouraging all countries, including India and Pakistan, to take all steps necessary to ensure the better physical protection of their nuclear assets. We will be encouraging both countries to consider measures which contribute to the safety and security of their nuclear programmes.
	Bearing these factors in mind, and consistent with our obligations under the Non-Proliferation Treaty, we have revised our policy as follows:—
	we will continue to deny all export licence applications (ELAs) for items listed on the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) Dual-Use List to nuclear and nuclear related end users in India and Pakistan. We will consider all applications for other items assessed as licensable, including those licensable under the WMD end use control, with particular vigilance in making licensing decisions on a case by case basis. Licences may be issued if there are no end use concerns. Consistent with our obligations under the Non-Proliferation Treaty, licences may also be issued in exceptional cases where the Government is satisfied that the proposed exports will contribute to the physical protection or security of civil or military nuclear facilities or assets in India and Pakistan;
	we will continue to discourage contacts by UK nuclear scientists or those working in the UK nuclear industry with their counterparts from, or personnel who we know are likely to work in, nuclear or nuclear related organisations in India or Pakistan. We will also discourage visits by such counterparts and personnel to UK nuclear facilities. However, this will not apply where such contacts would contribute to the safety and security of India and Pakistan's nuclear programmes, or further the UK's non-proliferation objectives, consistent with our obligations under the Non-Proliferation Treaty.
	Since carrying out their nuclear tests in 1998, neither India nor Pakistan have demonstrated sufficient commitment to meet their obligations to reduce nuclear tensions set down in UNSCR 1172. We are now encouraging both countries to engage in a bilateral dialogue on nuclear confidence building measures.

US Anti-personnel Mines

Tam Dalyell: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs whether US anti-personnel mines have been (a) transited, (b) stockpiled and (c) maintained on British Indian Ocean Territory during the conduct of operations in Afghanistan.

Denis MacShane: No.